Supp vs Chatwoot
Honest comparison with real pricing, feature differences, and clear recommendations for when each tool is the right choice.
Quick Comparison
| Supp | Chatwoot | |
|---|---|---|
| Per-resolution cost | $0.20-0.30 | Included (limited AI credits) |
| Base monthly fee | $0 | Free (self-hosted) or $19-$99/agent/mo (cloud) |
| Free option | $5 credit | Free community edition (self-hosted, MIT license) |
| AI approach | Purpose-built classifier (no hallucination) | Captain AI uses OpenAI for reply suggestions and summaries. Not autonomous resolution. Open source with full code access. |
Features
| Feature | Supp | Chatwoot |
|---|---|---|
| AI classification | 315 intents, 92% accuracy | ✗ |
| Auto-resolution | ✓ | Basic (Captain AI) |
| Knowledge base required | ✗ | ✓ |
| Chat widget | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email support | Via integrations | ✓ |
| Phone support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Built-in help center | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multi-language AI | English only | ✓ |
| Analytics | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team management | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ |
Who Each Tool Is For
Choose Supp if:
You want AI-first support without per-seat pricing. You value fast, accurate classification over full help desk features. Your team is small (1-10 people) and you want a standalone solution, or you have an existing tool and want smarter AI triage in front of it.
Choose Chatwoot if:
Technical teams wanting full control and self-hosting. Privacy-conscious organizations. Companies wanting to customize their support tool. Budget-conscious teams with DevOps capability.
Where Supp Wins
- +Purpose-built AI classification (vs basic copilot)
- +No DevOps required
- +More sophisticated automation and routing
- +Priority scoring built in
- +MCP server for developer workflows
Where Chatwoot Wins
- +Open source (MIT license)
- +Fully self-hostable (complete data ownership)
- +Customizable codebase
- +Free community edition
- +More messaging channels (Telegram, Line, WhatsApp)